Mr. Gerry McNally from the probation service in Ireland stressed the importance of developing trust between EU Member States to coordinate transfers throughout the EU. Therefore, as Gerry McNally mentioned, practitioners should think about promoting an adequate level of specialization, to which they are able to work with mutual recognition instruments that include deprivation or limitation on liberty covered by the 9^th round of mutual evaluation. With that said, EU Member States are encouraged to promote participation of practitioners at the EU level, by sharing knowledge and raising awareness in order to build up trust.

Ms. Ana Cristina Neves from the probation of Portugal highlighted the perspective of Portugal, by which she points out that the probation teams do frequently receive requests from the Courts to supervise community measures of probationers residing abroad, namely in the EU countries that transposed FD 947. And it is crucial to raise more awareness as still to this day Courts remain resistant to using this option. Consequently, the lack of using FD947, creates the reality for people to stay in prison, and remain to serve their sentences in Portugal. While the alternative could substitute a better option for the offender if the person in itself would be allowed to serve their sentences in their home country.

Furthermore, Mr. Daniel Danglades from the Ministry of France highlighted the French perspective on the Framework Decisions. Whereas Ms. Maija Andrijauska from the European Judicial Network, discussed the future changes related to alternative sanctions and probation measures on the EJN website. Last but not least, Mr. Ramin Farinpour from the Academy of European Law (ERA) presented the work and experience in implementing training projects on the Framework Decisions for practitioners.

Jana Spero, Secretary General from CEP closed the meeting by stressing the importance of coming together to discuss such matters, especially with discrepancies in European Law, it’s important to create an alternative for offenders, by which they are handed the opportunity to set out their sentences in their home country. However, this is easier said than done, since EU Member States, first and foremost, must trust each other before uniformity is able to be promoted at a Pan-European level.

Report

Click here to view the report.

Presentations

The findings of the 9th Round evaluation reports, Mr. Gerry McNally, Probation Service, Ireland

Raising awareness about FD947 – the experience of the Portuguese Probation Service, Ms. Ana Cristina Neves, Probation and Prison Service, Portugal

Framework Decisions – French experience, Mr. Daniel Danglades, Ministry of Justice, France

European Judicial Network: future changes on the website related to alternative sanctions and probation measures, Ms. Maija Andrijauska, European Judicial Network

The Academy of European Law: work and experience in implementing training projects on the Framework Decisions for practitioners, Mr. Ramin Farinpour, The Academy of European Law (ERA)

>> more about Framework Decisions